Houston Baptist
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,533  Gabriela Busquet SR 22:12
1,884  Emilly Dunn JR 22:35
2,264  Stephanie Aguilar JR 23:04
2,440  Arielle Price SO 23:20
2,558  Kierstin Santana JR 23:31
2,748  Katie Haring SO 23:56
2,820  Brielle Eskridge SO 24:07
National Rank #269 of 339
South Central Region Rank #23 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 24th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 1.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Gabriela Busquet Emilly Dunn Stephanie Aguilar Arielle Price Kierstin Santana Katie Haring Brielle Eskridge
Texas A&M Invitational 09/26 22:09 23:03
HBU Invite 10/09 1384 22:22 23:10 22:53 23:27 24:34 24:36
Alabama Crimson Classic Invitational 10/16 1365 22:24 22:27 23:31 23:33 23:50 24:10
Southland Conference Championships 10/30 1322 22:19 22:37 22:36 23:14 23:33 24:00 23:49
South Central Region Championships 11/13 1338 21:48 22:26 23:25 23:06 23:42 24:07





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 23.3 607 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.4 3.0 9.3 38.9 46.9



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Gabriela Busquet 83.8
Emilly Dunn 102.5
Stephanie Aguilar 129.2
Arielle Price 143.5
Kierstin Santana 151.1
Katie Haring 162.6
Brielle Eskridge 166.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 0.0% 0.0 16
17 0.0% 0.0 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 0.4% 0.4 19
20 1.4% 1.4 20
21 3.0% 3.0 21
22 9.3% 9.3 22
23 38.9% 38.9 23
24 46.9% 46.9 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0